|The Greatest Story Ever Told About
The Greatest Man That Ever Lived
Darwin's Theory of Evolution
Evolution is a relatively new concept. Charles
Darwin is considered to be the originator of the
Evolution of the Species Theory, but actually the
groundwork was laid long before he came on the
scene. Darwin was influenced by the works of his
grandfather and others who's material he used
along with his own beliefs to publish his Origin of
the Species theory in 1859. He was simply at the
right place at the right time and knew the right
people who promoted this theory for him.
The first to promote the theory of evolution in modern Europe were members of the Masonic society
known as the Rosicrucians in the fifteenth century. The basic interest of the Rosicrucians was
scientific. The most important characteristic of its members was the fact that they believed that
every stage of development was a stage in the process of evolution. Those generally thought to be
the founders of the theory of evolution are the French biologist Jean Lamarck and the English
biologist Charles Darwin. According to the classic story, Lamarck first proposed the theory of
evolution, and he based it on the inheritance of acquired traits. Later, Darwin proposed a second
theory based on natural selection. Another theoretician who played an important role in the origins
of the theory of evolution was Erasmus Darwin, Charles Darwin's grandfather. Erasmus Darwin was
an eighteenth century contemporary of Lamarck. A physicist, psychologist and poet, and he was
recognized as an authority. Erasmus Darwin is mainly noted as one of England's most prominent
naturalists. This was the starting point of Erasmus Darwin's theory of evolution.
In the 1780's and 90's, Erasmus Darwin developed the main outlines of the theory of evolution,
according to which all living things came from a single common ancestor by chance and according
to the laws of nature. He did his research in an eight acre botanic garden he had prepared, and
sought evidence that would prove his idea. He explained his theory in two books, entitled Temple
of Nature and Zoonomia. In 1784 he founded a society to manage the dissemination of his ideas,
known as the Philosophical Society. Years later, Charles Darwin would inherit his grandfather's
ideas and the basic outlines for the proposal of his theory of evolution. Charles Darwin's theory
elaborated upon the structure established by his grandfather, while the Philosophical Society
became one of the greatest and most passionate supporters of his theory. In short, Erasmus
Darwin was the true pioneer of the theory we know of as the theory of evolution that has been
propagandized throughout the world over the past 150 years.
Where did Erasmus Darwin discover the idea of evolution?
Where did his interest in this subject come from? After a
thorough search for the answer to this question, we discover the
interesting fact that Erasmus Darwin was a Freemason. But
Erasmus Darwin was no ordinary Mason, he was one of the
highest ranking masters in the organization. He was the master
of the famous Canongate lodge in Edinburgh, Scotland.
Moreover, he had close ties with the Jacobin Masons who were
the organizers of the revolution in France at the time, and with
the Illuminati, whose prime cause was fostering hostility to
religion. That is, Erasmus Darwin was an important name in
European Masonic anti-religious organizations. Erasmus
educated his son Robert (Charles Darwin's father), who too had
been made a member of the Masonic lodge. For this reason,
Charles Darwin received the inheritance of Masonic teachings
from both his father and his grandfather.
Erasmus Darwin hoped to have his son Robert develop and publish his theory, but it would be his
grandson Charles who would undertake the enterprise. Although it came some time later, Erasmus
Darwin's Temple of Nature was finally revised by Charles Darwin. Darwin's views did not have the
weight of a scientific theory; it was merely the expression of a naturalist doctrine that accepts that
nature has creative power. Finally, Darwin appeared at a stage when the long struggle had begun in
Europe to supposedly destroy faith in God and religion, replace it with the naturalist philosophy and
a humanist model for human life. The most significant force behind this struggle was the Masonic
organization, of which so many thinkers, ideologues and political leaders were members. What
Masonry tried to do with the help of Darwinism was to produce a morally degenerate society that
recognized no Divine Law and had no fear of God.
Masons, thinking that Darwinism could serve their goals,
played a great role in its dissemination among the masses. As
soon as Darwin's theory was published, a group of volunteer
propagandists formed around it, the most famous of whom was
Thomas Huxley who was called Darwin's "bulldog." Huxley,
whose ardent advocacy of Darwinism was the single factor
most responsible for its rapid acceptance, brought the world's
attention to the theory of evolution in the Debate at the Oxford
University Museum in which he entered into on June 30, 1860
with the bishop of Oxford, Samuel Wilberforce.
Huxley's great dedication to spreading the idea of evolution, together with his establishment
connections, is brought into further light according to the following fact: Huxley was a member
the Royal Society, one of England's most prestigious scientific institutions and, like nearly all the
other members of this institution, was a senior Mason. Other members of the Royal Society lent
Darwin significant support, both before and after the book was published. This Masonic society
accepted Darwin and Darwinism to such an extent that Darwin's medal was awarded annually to a
scientist deemed worthy of the honor. In short, Darwin wasn't acting alone; from the moment his
theory was proposed, he received the support that came from the social classes and groups
whose nucleus was made up of Masons. Darwinism came at the desired time; Darwin' s theory
that man is the descendant of a lower animal destroyed the entire foundation of Christian belief.
Apart from the fact that evolutionists have not been able to give any scientific proof that life can
be generated from lifeless matter, they have also not been able to provide even a theoretical
explanation of it. This is because the structure of the most basic single celled living organism is
highly complex. It is mathematically impossible that even a cell's basic constituents; proteins,
DNA or RNA, could have come to be by chance, much less the cell itself. The fact that the
probability of life generating by chance is zero, proves the existence of order, in other words the
fact of Creation. On this matter, the famous English astronomer and mathematician, Fred Hoyle,
makes this comment: "Indeed, such a theory (that life was assembled by an intelligence) is so
obvious that one wonders why it is not widely accepted as being self-evident."
Ernst Haeckel was a German biologist, naturalist, philosopher, physician, professor, and artist
who discovered, described and named thousands of new species, mapped a genealogical tree
relating all life forms, and coined many terms in biology, including anthropogeny, ecology,
phylum, phylogeny, stem cell, and Protista. Haeckel promoted and popularised Charles Darwin's
work in Germany. Ernst Haeckel falsified his drawings in order to support the theory he
advanced. Haeckel’s forgeries purported to show that fish and human embryos resembled one
another. When he was caught the only defense he offered was that other evolutionists had
committed similar offences. Haeckel was charged with fraud by five professors and convicted by
a university court at Jena where he admitted that several of his drawings were forgeries and that
hundreds of his contemporaries were guilty of the same charge.
For the past 150 years, evolutionist scientists have been working diligently to propagandize the
public into believing that modern humans are descended from ancient apes. The most difficult
theoretical leap for the theory of evolution is this supposed million year transition from ape to
human. To which the question needs to be asked "If man evolved from apes, why are there still
apes?" And where are the bones of the transitional ape/man beings of which there should be
several million. Why have none been found? And so the quest to find some kind of proof began.
The first of these convenient evolutionary “discoveries”
was the “Neanderthal Man” found in the Neander Valley of
Germany in 1856, just in time for the release of Darwin’s
Origin of Species. To this day, reconstructed drawings of
hairy ape like “Neanderthal” men are depicted in scholarly
journals and school textbooks and claimed to be a missing
evolutionary link. The fact is, however, that all so-called
Neanderthal remains have never been shown to be
different from modern humans than an Asian from a
Caucasian, or an Inuit from an Aborigine. Also the skull
size shows its brain was actually 13% larger than the
average brain of modern man, making it impossible to be
an intermediary between man and ape. Even Time
magazine in 1971 proclaimed the primitiveness of
Neanderthal to be unwarranted, that he could walk the
street today unrecognized, one writer even commenting that historians of the future may “declare
us all insane for not detecting and refuting this incredible blunder.”
One of the main proponents pushing Neanderthal Man as an authentic species was Reiner Protsch,
a German professor who dated the fossils at 36,000 years old allowing them to fit perfectly in the
evolutionist’s timeline. In 2005, however, Protsch was forced to retire in disgrace by a panel of
Frankfurt University heads who determined he had “fabricated data and plagiarized the work of his
colleagues over the past 30 years.” The once-renowned “carbon-dating expert” has presently
been completely ostracized from the scientific community. It has since been determined that all
Neanderthal skeletal remains are no more than a few thousand years old, some only a few
hundred! They have also found modern human DNA in the bones, that their height of 5’9” is
comparable to our average, and they had advanced tools, and buried their dead. University of
Berlin Professor Rudolf Virchow, Ernst Haeckel’s former professor and the “father of modern
pathology” back in 1872 concluded the original “Neanderthal” remains were simply that of an
unfortunate homo sapiens who had suffered childhood rickets, adult arthritis, and was victim to
several damaging blows to the head.
In 1891-92, the next ape-man “discovery” was found in Java,
Indonesia by Eugene Dubois, who “coincidentally” happened
to be a student and apprentice of evolutionist hoaxster Ernst
Haeckel! Dubois found a skullcap, a leg bone, a jaw fragment
and three teeth, from which was reconstructed into the ape
like “Java Man.” Within 10 years of its discovery, Java Man
was the main subject of over 80 evolution books and articles.
It was given the “scientific name,” of “Anthropopithecus
erectus,” and later changed to “Pithecanthropus erectus” and
finally “Homo erectus” undoubtedly for scientific reasons.
The bones were found in 1891-92 on the Indonesian Island of Java in Southeast Asia along the
banks of the Solo River. And there was an interesting assortment. He found a leg bone, a skullcap,
a jaw fragment and three teeth. And that’s what he concocted Java man from. Interestingly
enough some of the teeth were old and some young. The bones belonged to apes, female and
male. It was an interesting conglomeration and the reason that people didn’t catch on to it is
because the find of Dubois was kept from scholars for about 30 years. He also withheld the
discovery of modern human remains, which were found in the same stratum as Java man. Of
course, that would have ruined his claims that Java man was the ancestor of modern day humans.
Finally, enough pressure was placed on him that the actual bones were allowed to be examined
and the discrepancies were found. And eventually the world found out that this was a hoax.
“Java Man’s” teeth were found to be of different ages and the bones a mixture of human and ape,
with a giant gibbon skull! Rudolph Virchow, Haeckel’s own professor and the foremost pathology
expert of his time stated, “In my opinion this creature was an animal, a giant gibbon. And the thigh
bone has not the slightest connection with the skull.” He and many others have concluded the
thigh bone is quite clearly human while the skullcap and teeth belonged to a primate.
In 1912 a doctor and paleo-anthropologist named Charles Dawson claimed to have found a jawbone
and cranial fragment of an ape-man transitional form in a pit in Piltdown, England. It was alleged to
be 500,000 years old and was displayed as absolute proof of human evolution in museums across
the world. For the next 40 years, scores of “scientific” articles, artist reconstructions, and over 500
doctoral theses were written about “Piltdown man.” Objections and criticisms were raised
immediately by contemporaries like Arthur Keith but managed to be mitigated by Dawson until
1953 when tests proved conclusively that the Piltdown skull was actually human and only a few
hundred years old, while the lower protruding jaw was from a recently deceased orangutan.
Investigators found that Dawson had artificially worn down the orangutan jaw, and that the
“primitive tools” discovered alongside the fossils were imitations Dawson had sharpened with
steel implements! Dawson also filled the molar surfaces of the teeth to more resemble those of
man, and stained all the fossils with potassium dichromate to give them an antiquated appearance.
The stains quickly disappeared when dipped in acid. Since conclusively being proven a hoax in
1953 many of Dawson’s other paleontological “finds” have also proven to be fakes or planted. In
2003, Dr. Miles Russell of Bournemouth University published the results of an investigation into
Dawson’s antiquarian collection concluding that at least 38 specimens were clear fakes, noting that
“Dawson’s entire academic career appears to have been built upon deceit, sleight of hand, fraud
and deception, the ultimate gain being international recognition.”
The next fraudulent attempt at creating and
propagating a supposed ape-man transitional
form was carried out in 1922 by Henry Fairfield
Osborn. Co-founder of the American Eugenics
Society, President of the White Supremacist
Pioneer Fund and director of the American
Museum of Natural History, Osborn declared
that he had been sent an anomalous tooth
found in Snake Brook, Nebraska, which had
characteristics of both ape and man! He
determined that it came from the Pliocene
period of ancient history, from the transitional
species “Pithecanthropus erectus,” and
affectionately labeled the tooth’s owner
“Nebraska Man.” Once “Nebraska Man” made
the media rounds of popular publications and
the pliable public was sufficiently
propagandized, the story disappeared until 1928
when William Bryan and William Gregory had
the opportunity to independently examine the
tooth. Their investigations both conclusively
found that the tooth did not belong to a man or
ape, but was actually from an extinct species of
wild American pig called Presthennops! After
William Gregory published his article,
“Hesperopithecus: Apparently Not an Ape Nor
a Man,” in Science magazine all drawings and
models of “Nebraska Man” and his “family”
were quickly removed from evolutionist
In 1927 Davidson Black declared he had discovered
five crushed skulls and several teeth near Beijing
belonging to an ancient ape man species now widely
known as “Peking Man.” Somewhere between 1941-
1945 all the original bones were mysteriously “lost,”
however, leaving only a few plaster casts left to
Some evolutionists believed that ‘half-man half-ape’ creatures were
to be found not only in the fossil record, but also alive in various
parts of the world. In the early 20th century, these pursuits for
‘living transitional links’ led to unfortunate incidents, one of the
cruelest of which is the story of a Pygmy by the name of Ota Benga.
Ota Benga was captured in 1904 by an evolutionist researcher in the
Congo. In his own tongue, his name meant ‘friend.’ He had a wife
and two children. Chained and caged like an animal, he was taken to
the USA where evolutionist scientists displayed him to the public in
the St. Louis World Fair along with other ape species and introduced
him as ‘the closest transitional link to man.’ Two years later they
took him to the Bronx Zoo in New York and there they exhibited him
under the denomination of ‘ancient ancestors of man’ along with a
few chimpanzee, a gorilla named Dinah, and an orangutan called
Dohung. Dr. William Hornaday, the zoo’s evolutionist director gave
long speeches on how proud he was to have this exceptional
‘transitional form’ in his zoo and treated caged Ota Benga as if he
were an ordinary animal. Unable to bear the treatment he was
subjected to, Ota Benga eventually committed suicide.
In 1974 Donald Johansson
discovered “Lucy” a three foot tall
supposedly three million year old
“Australopithicine” in Ethiopia.
Widely publicized as our oldest
direct human ancestor, Lucy made
the usual rounds of scientific
magazine journals and school
textbooks. Don Johansson
modestly claimed that Lucy was
“the most important find made by
anyone in the history of the entire
human race,” and the media
heralded him a hero. He was
promoted from assistant professor
to receiving his own Institute for
Human Biology at Berkley. During
all this time he never allowed
scientists to examine Lucy’s bones
until 1982, eight years later. Since
then, and as more Australopithecine
skeletons have been found and
examined, however, many leading
evolutionists agree that Lucy is
simply an extinct type of ape, similar
to modern pygmy chimpanzees and
nothing more. They may have
walked slightly more upright than
most apes, but were not bipedal or
erect, could not talk, spent most
time in trees, and walked on all fours.
Lord Solly Zuckerman and Professor Charles Oxnard did 15 years of research on Australopithecines
along with a team of five specialists coming to the conclusion that all the various specimens of
Australopithecus they examined were only an ordinary ape genus and definitely not bipedal. The
French Science and Life magazine ran the cover story in May 1999 “Goodbye Lucy” writing about
how “Lucy” the most famous fossil of Australopithecus was not the root of the human race and
needs to be removed from our supposed family tree. However in 2014 a movie named “Lucy” was
released by Masonic “Universal Pictures” where the Lucy ape woman fraud is still treated as
scientific fact throughout the entire movie.
This is a brief summary of Darwinism, a more detailed study can be undertaken for more details as
the internet is full of information on these types of hoaxes who's sole purpose was to turn people
away from God. Even though Darwinism is based on lies and inconclusive evidence, it is still
taught as fact in many schools and universities and is stated as such in many science journals.
Because it was so vigorously promoted by the Masons, it has entered the minds of many as being
the absolute truth even though it has never been proven. The same propaganda machine was
used each time. When a new specimen was found, immediately the propaganda team sprang into
action without even testing the specimens. The findings were withheld from scrutiny until the
news had been spread far and wide and later, upon testing, the specimens were found to be false.
By then it was too late, as even a retraction would not undo what had already been reported. This
strategy was used over and over to brainwash the public into believing a lie, a hoax, and to turn
people away from God, the true creator of life. For all the damage they have done, those that
promoted these lies while they knew full well they were lies, will someday have to stand before
God to answer for their actions, and they won't be able to lie then. If you have been caught up in
believing this lie, this is your opportunity to repent and turn back to God and renounce evolution
once and for all. There is no place for evolution in a Christian that believes the Bible. Evolution is
the opposite of what the Bible teaches, it cannot be accommodated into Biblical theology.
The Bible describes creation in one sentence. "God formed man from the dust of the earth,
breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and man became a living being." Only God can create
life and its only because of the "breath of God" that living beings and creatures can exist.
Dinosaurs were unheard of before the 1800's. They are not mentioned in the Bible, and no one
even used the term before that. The term Dinosauria was originally used by Sir Richard Owen in
1842 in a two hour speech that reportedly held his audience captive with this incredible story. The
original dinosaurs of this new group were Megalosaurus, Iguanodon and Hylaeosaurus, however,
each of these animals was known only from fragmentary specimens. It wasn't until the discoveries
of dinosaurs in North America in the mid 19th century that people began to get a clearer picture of
what dinosaurs actually looked like. Or should we say what they were re-created to look like from
the few fragments that were discovered.
It is generally accepted that the first discovery of dinosaur remains in North America was made in
1854 by Ferdinand Vandiveer Hayden during his exploration of the upper Missouri River. Near the
confluence of the Judith and Missouri Rivers Hayden's party recovered a small collection of
isolated teeth which were later described by the Philadelphia paleontologist Joseph Leidy in 1856,
in the Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. So what dinosaurs looked
like were described in 1842 before the discoveries were made in 1854.
Another North American discovery of a dinosaur skeleton which “proved dinosaurs were real”
was by William Parker Foulke in 1858. It seems that 20 years earlier a man named Hopkins found
some large animal bones in a pit in New Jersey and had them on display in his home. Foulke
learned of this and went to the site and allegedly pulled out “the first nearly complete skeleton of
a dinosaur” called a Hadrosaurus. This skeleton became the first to be put on public display and
caused quite a sensation. However, it turns out that the skull used in the initial display was a fake
one that was manufactured using an iguana skull as a model. The fake iguana type skull was later
replaced with a duck bill type skull which is now said to belong to another dinosaur, in other words
it was a fake too. How much more was faked is unknown.
Dinosaur skeletons were found for the first time in abundance in the Garden Park area of Colorado
and at Como Bluff, Wyoming, in the late 1870s. These specimens initiated the First Great Dinosaur
Rush in North America, driven largely by the efforts of a Philadelphia paleontologist, Edward
Drinker Cope and Othniel Marsh a paleontologist from Yale University. These two men started as
friends but became bitter rivals in a feud of legendary proportions. The stories surrounding these
two include tales of armed field parties, spies, and intercepting shipments of fossils intended for
the other. Cope and his arch rival, Othniel Charles Marsh, professor of paleontology at Yale
University, had been engaged in what have been called 'The Bone Wars' throughout the 1870s and
1880s. It was a fierce scientific rivalry that entailed some of the most underhanded shenanigans in
the history of science, but it also amassed stupendous collections of fossils. But why fossils were
being shipped to the discoverers and from whom was never determined. Fossils should have
been shipped from the discoverers, not to them. Were they burying the fossils and then
Marsh is said to have discovered 80 dinosaurs, while Cope discovered 56. Out of the 136 dinosaur
species supposedly discovered by the two men, only 32 are presently considered valid and even
those are questionable; the rest have all proven to be falsifications and fabrications! None of them
claimed to find a complete skeleton either, so all their work involved reconstructions. In fact, to
this day no complete skeleton has ever been found, and so all dinosaurs are reconstructions. The
fact that “T-Rex” bones have sold at auctions for upwards of $12 million shows how lucrative the
field of dinosaur-hunting can be, and it just happens to be Museum officials who seem to make the
most prolific finds!
The Second Great Dinosaur Rush took place in the badlands of the Red Deer River in southern
Alberta. Dinosaur remains had been known from this region as early as 1884 but it wasn't until
1910 that this region became an active collecting area. It was here that the second great collecting
rivalry took place between Barnum Brown of the American Museum of Natural History in New York
and C. H. Sternberg of the Geological Survey of Canada. Why were there no discoveries by native
Americans in all the years previous when they roamed the American continents? Nor is there any
belief of dinosaurs in the native American folklore or tradition.
For that matter, why were there no discoveries prior to the nineteenth century in any part of the
world? According to the World Book Encyclopedia, "before the 1800's, no one ever knew that
dinosaurs ever existed". During the late 1800's and early 1900's, large deposits of dinosaur
remains were discovered in western North America, Europe, Asia, and Africa. Dinosaur deposits
also lie in Belgium, Mongolia, Tanzania, West Germany, and many other parts of the world.
Discoveries and excavations were not made by disinterested people, such as farmers, ranchers,
hikers, outdoor recreationists, building construction industry basement excavators, pipeline
trench diggers, and mining industry personnel but rather by people with vested interests, such as
paleontologists, scientists, university professors, and museum organization personnel who were
intentionally looking for dinosaur bones or who have studied dinosaurs previously. The finds are
often made during special dinosaur-bone hunting trips and expeditions by these people to far
away regions already inhabited and explored. This seems highly suspicious.
"There is the possibility that there may have been an ongoing effort since the
earliest dinosaur "discoveries" to plant fossils and mix and match bones of
various animals, such as crocodiles, alligators, iguanas, giraffes, elephants,
cattle, kangaroos, ostriches, emus, dolphins, whales, rhinoceroses, etc. to
construct and create a new man-made concept of a prehistoric animal which
they called the dinosaur."
Then the scientific community jumped on board and from this assortment of bones and remains,
were able to tell us how long ago dinosaurs lived, what they looked like, what they ate, etc, etc.
In other words they became the authority on dinosaurs from that point on. But what they still don't
know is what they evolved from and what they would have evolved into in their supposed 135
million year existence. In fact they don't even know why they went extinct. There are several
theories, and even scientists don't agree but two common theories are either from volcanic activity
or an asteroid hitting the earth. Both of these theories are questionable when one considers that
either of these events could have killed every last dinosaur, but other species somehow survived.
Especially since dinosaur bones have been found all over the world. If this was a world event, how
did the other species survive?
Since then there have been countless dinosaur museums, movies, books, comics, cartoons,
stories, and stuffed animals created to keep the hoax going. It's big business. This invention has
made billions for those who exploited it and has also reinforced the public's belief in evolution and
the Big Bang. And just like evolution, every few years a new specimen is found (even if it's just a
few bones) which again re-enforces the belief in evolution. And this is how the game is played on
the gullible public who actually believe this to be true. This so called "evidence" becomes so
overwhelming that it's hard to disbelieve only because the majority believe it. And again, no proof
is provided, just speculation, theory, and propaganda.
There is no mention of dinosaurs in the Bible. The word Leviathan is used, but refers to a large sea
creature, maybe a whale. The word Behemoth refers to a large land animal, but the meaning of the
word is uncertain, maybe a hippo or an elephant. According to the Biblical account of creation, God
created the earth and all the animals, plants, and mankind in 6 days. Counting backwards based on
events and lifespans, the creation of earth was about 6 thousand years ago. Science tells us that
dinosaurs went extinct 65 million years ago. If dinosaurs went extinct 65 million years ago, then
they certainly did not live on the earth that God created. To believe evolution it is necessary to
stretch it out over millions of years, otherwise how could the species have evolved. Certainly not
in 6 thousand years. Therefore, the Biblical account and Evolution are two totally separate stories
which cannot be integrated. And...they can't both be right either.
In 1982 a skull fragment found in the Spanish town of Orce was hailed to be the oldest fossilized
human remain ever found in Eurasia! “Orce man” was supposedly a 17 year old ape man who lived
between 900,000 - 1,600,000 years ago, and was presented to the world with the usual
reconstructed drawings showing a young, hairy man ape teenager. In 1983, however, a team of
scientists from France concluded that the skull fragment was actually from a four month old donkey.
Darwinism simply could not have happened mainly due to the absolute impossibility of a single cell
to happen by chance. As stated by Astrobiologist Chandra Wichramasinghe "The likelihood of the
spontaneous formation of life from inanimate matter is one to a number with 40,000 zeros after it …
It is big enough to bury Darwin and the whole theory of evolution. The beginnings of life were not
random; they must have been the product of purposeful intelligence. We used to have an open
mind; now we realize that the only logical answer to life is creation - and not accidental random
The evolution process is said to have gone from single celled life forms to invertibrates to fish to
amphibians to reptiles to mammals and then to humans. If this is so, then there are some
legitimate questions which need to be answered. Using the apes to human chain, did all apes
evolve into humans or just some of them? In other words if apes became humans, why are there
still apes. Or did just some apes become humans, and if so, why only some? And if this process
took millions of years, there must be millions of fossils of the transitional creatures. Where are
they? And why did evolution stop? Why are they no longer evolving. Where are the living
transitional creatures in the entire chain? None of this exists, neither the living creatures or the
fossils of the entire chain. Evolutionists have no explanation for this as the entire concepts is
purely guesswork and speculation known as theory. And this is not even considering the
complexity of change that each cell would have to go through to be able to become a new
species. The odds of this are astronomical.
Evolution cannot be proven scientifically. Neither math or physics can be applied to prove the
concept. It is purely speculation based on nothing more than assumption. With the lack of fossil
or living evidence it is impossible to prove these assumptions. That is why it will always be
nothing more than theory.
Obviously, many large bones have been discovered all over the world, but how many of those
were actual dinosaur bones? In most cases the bones were mixed with other species bones and
the dinosaurs were reconstructed from only a few bones, so no one really knows if that is what
they should look like. Some of them could be sea creatures, and some could be land creatures.
The sea creatures would be bigger because the water would support much of their weight. It is
questionable if some large land dinosaurs could have ever existed due to their size - they could
not sustain themselves even if they ate 24 hours a day. An African elephant has to eat from 12 -
18 hours a day to sustain itself, how could dinosaurs which are several times larger do it? The
T-Rex weighed almost twice as much as an elephant yet was able to walk on 2 legs instead of
four. The large dinosaurs weighed as much as 80 tons which would have put tremendous
pressure on their bones, joints, and muscles. Especially if they got stuck in the mud or had to
run. It is also questionable if some dinosaurs could walk without falling over the way their bodies
were proportioned and if they could get back up if they did. And then there is the extinction
problem which cannot be explained. So there are many uncertainties surround the dinosaur story
which simply cannot be substantiated.
The evolution story was invented in order to give people who don't believe in God something to
believe in. Otherwise, they just might start to believe in the creation story. Eventhough evolution
pushes the boundaries, many still believe it only because it is what is taught as fact in school
even though it's all theory. This is the indoctrination process of our world. The Deep State does
not want people who can think and reason, they want people who will believe and obey.
I won't write in detail about Giants because Steve Quayle has researched this topic very thoroughly
for over 30 years and has written extensively about it. You can find his books and research Here.
Until the early 1900's many museums displayed skeletons of giants that were found in many areas
of the world. Some of them were between 6 and 30 feet tall. Some were found individually and
some in groups. Many newspapers and magazines published articles on the discovery of giant
skeletons. Then everything changed.
After the Smithsonian Institute came on the scene in 1846 the giant skeletons began to disappear.
Over the years, they were no longer in museums, and the articles stopped. There are reports that
the Smithsonian was involved in this cover up, but that was later dismissed as inaccurate due to
Personally I believe that this was indeed a big cover up by the Smithsonian. The reason was
because they wanted to promote the Theory of Evolution and giants didn't fit with that teaching.
The Bible speaks of giants which I believe gave them all the more reason to destroy the evidence.
You can do your own research and come to your own conclusions, but until today, giant skeletons
are not publicly displayed and very few articles are published about them. Instead, we keep getting
articles about the evolution of mankind to brainwash us to believe in evolution as being our origin.
I believe that giants did exist on this earth, just like the Bible says they did and Steve Quayle has
done an excellent job putting together the information to support this.
To determine where dinosaurs fit in the creation story, here are a few things to consider. If God
created dinosaurs at the same time that he created the other animals, then why are they not among
us now? The other animals are, except for some that have gone extinct. With over 500 species of
dinosaurs, it's highly unlikely that they would all become extinct. And if the dinosaurs died in the
flood, then why did they? According to Genesis 6, God was grieved that he made man for he saw
that every intention of his heart was only evil all the time. It doesn't get much worse than this, and
like he destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah for the sake of the rest of humanity, so he rescued Noah
and his sons and their wives for that same purpose and started again. But what about the
animals? Why did they have to die? I think this can be understood easier if we consider the Book
of Enoch especially Chapters 6 and 7. Here is part of the Book of Enoch that describes the
Watchers coming to earth and what they did. If you wish to read the entire Book of Enoch you can
find it here.
And it came to pass when the children of men had multiplied that in those days were born unto them
beautiful and comely daughters. And the angels, the children of the heaven, saw and lusted after
them, and said to one another: 'Come, let us choose us wives from among the children of men and
beget us children.' And Semjaza, who was their leader, said unto them: 'I fear ye will not
indeed agree to do this deed, and I alone shall have to pay the penalty of a great sin.' And they all
answered him and said: 'Let us all swear an oath, and all bind ourselves by mutual imprecations
not to abandon this plan but to do this thing.' Then sware they all together and bound themselves
by mutual imprecations upon it. And they were in all two hundred; who descended in the days of
Jared on the summit of Mount Hermon, and they called it Mount Hermon, because they had sworn
and bound themselves by mutual imprecations upon it. And these are the names of their leaders:
Samlazaz, their leader, Araklba, Rameel, Kokablel, Tamlel, Ramlel, Danel, Ezeqeel, Baraqijal,
Asael, Armaros, Batarel, Ananel, Zaq1el, Samsapeel, Satarel, Turel, Jomjael, Sariel. These are their
chiefs of tens.
And all the others together with them took unto themselves wives, and each chose for himself one,
and they began to go in unto them and to defile themselves with them, and they taught them charms
and enchantments, and the cutting of roots, and made them acquainted with plants. And they
became pregnant, and they bare great giants, whose height was three thousand ells: Who consumed
all the acquisitions of men. And when men could no longer sustain them, the giants turned against
them and devoured mankind. And they began to sin against birds, and beasts, and reptiles, and fish,
and to devour one another's flesh, and drink the blood. Then the earth laid accusation against the
These Watchers (eternal angelic beings) who came to earth corrupted themselves and humanity by
taking wives and producing offspring with them. These offspring were giants but how they became
giants is not fully understood because how could ordinary women conceive and give birth to
giants? Unless they were born a normal size and then their growth was accelerated rapidly
through some means unknown to humans. The Watchers did have much more knowledge and
abilities than humans. Did they turn their offspring into giants so that they would rule over
mankind? Did the Watchers have knowledge of DNA manipulation? Did they corrupt the animals
as well as humans? I think this is very possible. These giants would also explain how the pyramids
and other structures were built.
The Watchers did not have the ability to create life, only God can do that, but they could have cross
bred or genetically modified species, and maybe even humans. Note that the Book of Enoch says
that they "began to sin against birds, and beasts, and reptiles, and fish." How do you sin against
fish? Or birds? Or reptiles? If you look at pictures of dinosaurs you can see bird, reptile and fish
characteristics in many of them. Did the Watchers create dinosaurs from mixtures of reptiles and
fish, and reptiles and birds, and beasts and reptiles?
To me this sounds like the most believable explanation for the origin of dinosaurs. Looking at their
pictures, they certainly are a very unique looking bunch, much different from God's other animal
creations. They look like a very novice attempt at creating a species. And if they had the ability to
accelerate growth, this would account for the size of some of them. And for this reason, God had to
destroy all the genetically modified animals and picked the ones that were not and brought them to
Noah to put on the ark. Because these Watchers disobeyed God by doing evil on earth, and cross
bred, genetically modified, and corrupted the humans and animals, God had to destroy all life with
a flood and start again.
The Bible says Noah was a righteous man, but the true meaning is "pure". This means that he was
not corrupted physically or genetically by the Watchers. Neither was his wife, his sons, and their
wives. These are the 8 people that were in the ark and would continue the human race. The Bible
says that God told Noah that the animals would "come to him" to put in the ark. He didn't have to
get them, God chose the ones that were not corrupted to continue his plan of animals multiplying
after their own kind something which the Watchers tried to destroy. God created all the creatures
in perfect balance. For example we need bees to pollinate plants to produce food. If they die, so
do we. This is another reason I believe that it was the Watchers and not God that produced
dinosaurs and why God had to destroy them and put a stop to this. The plant eaters would eat
more than their share due to their size and cause other animals to starve, and the meat eaters
would do the same. This would disrupt the balance of "nature" that God created.
The giants and all humanity and animals drowned in the flood and the giant's spirits became the
evil spirits mentioned in the Bible and the ones that Jesus would cast out of people. They don't
have a place as they neither belong in heaven or on earth so they seek to inhabit our bodies if we
let them. Today science refers to this as "multiple personality disorder" but I believe it's just
demon posession. The Watchers were chained up and are being held for the day of judgment
when they will be cast into the lake of fire for their sins.
The Bible does not mention dinosaurs but the Book of Enoch does give us a possible explanation.
I don't believe in evolution for the reasons I outlined earlier and also because I believe that we live
on the earth that God created 6 thousand years ago which would make evolution impossible.
However, I also don't doubt that there were bones from large creatures found all over the earth,
some of which could have been dinosaur bones. However, almost no dinosaur fossils were found
in the Middle East countries. Could it be because this is where most of the earth's population lived
at the time so the Watchers took up residence away from them to create their new species of
creatures? The Bible also tells us in Genesis 10:25 "And unto Eber were born two sons: the name
of one was Peleg; for in his days was the earth divided..." Because the earth was one land mass
until then, migration over the earth was quite easy. Most people lived in the Middle East region at
that time, and the most dinosaur bones were found in North and South America and in Asia.
According to the Bible, God didn't make any dinosaurs, but the Watchers could have. The flood
would also explain their "extinction" and how their fossils could have been preserved. So I find the
Biblical story much more believable and it fits with scripture.
For the latest scientific update on evolution Click Here.